Ask anything about this article
Hi! I've read this article.
What would you like to know?
@farhan
The tech industry has a microservices obsession. But here's an uncomfortable truth: most applications should start as a monolith. Let me explain when each architecture makes sense.
A monolith is a single deployable unit that contains all your application's functionality:
┌─────────────────────────────┐
│ Monolith │
│ ┌─────┐ ┌─────┐ ┌─────┐ │
│ │Users│ │Orders│ │Notify│ │
│ └─────┘ └─────┘ └─────┘ │
│ Shared DB │
└─────────────────────────────┘
Microservices break the application into small, independently deployable services:
┌────────┐ ┌────────┐ ┌────────┐
│User Svc│ │Order Svc│ │Notify │
│ + DB │ │ + DB │ │ + DB │
└────────┘ └────────┘ └────────┘
↕ ↕ ↕
Message Queue / API Gateway
What nobody tells you about microservices:
Choose monolith when:
✅ Simple development and debugging
✅ Easy local development (one repo, one command)
✅ ACID transactions across the entire system
✅ No network latency between components
✅ Straightforward deployment
✅ Lower infrastructure costs
Choose microservices when:
✅ Independent deployment and scaling
✅ Team autonomy and ownership
✅ Technology flexibility per service
✅ Fault isolation (one service failing doesn't crash everything)
✅ Organizational alignment (Conway's Law)
┌─────────────────────────────────┐
│ Modular Monolith │
│ ┌────────┐ ┌────────┐ ┌─────┐ │
│ │ Users │ │ Orders │ │Notif│ │
│ │ Module │ │ Module │ │Mod │ │
│ └───┬────┘ └───┬────┘ └──┬──┘ │
│ │ │ │ │
│ ┌───┴──────────┴──────────┴──┐ │
│ │ Shared Database │ │
│ └────────────────────────────┘ │
└─────────────────────────────────┘
Key principles:
Monolith → Modular Monolith → Selective Microservices
Start monolithic. When you hit genuine scaling problems, extract the specific component that needs independent scaling into a microservice. Don't pre-optimize for problems you don't have.
The best architecture is the one your team can build, deploy, and maintain effectively.